Converting 2025’s Inflationary Pressures into 2026’s Profits

TL;DR: Navigating the 2025 Canadian Foodservice Financial Landscape

The Bottom Line: The “shoebox accounting” era is dead. With operating costs surging (insurance +14%, food +13%, labour +11%) and real sales growth flatlining at 0.8%, precision in financial reporting is now an existential necessity for Canadian restaurateurs.

1. The New Cost of Labour (CPP & Compliance)

The 2025 year-end is the pivot point for significant payroll hikes starting Jan 1, 2026.

Two-Tier CPP: The Enhanced CPP is fully realized. Employers must track earnings against two ceilings: the YMPE ($74,600) and the new YAMPE ($85,000).
Cost Impact: The maximum annual employer cost per employee (CPP + EI) will jump to roughly $6,218 in 2026 ($4,646.45 for CPP + $1,572.30 for EI).
Tip Compliance: You must strictly distinguish between “Controlled Tips” (employer-managed pools/service charges) and “Direct Tips” (cash/electronic pass-through). Misclassifying controlled tips as direct leads to massive retroactive CPP/EI assessments.

2. The Digital Revenue Trap

The CRA now receives data directly from platforms like UberEats and DoorDash to cross-reference against your tax filings.

Gross vs. Net: Never record the “net deposit” from apps as sales. You must record the Gross Sale to accurately reflect revenue and claim the commission expenses. Failing to do so under-reports revenue and under-remits GST/HST.
Provincial Complexity: Marketplace Facilitator laws vary. In BC, SK, and MB, platforms remit PST, but you often still remit the GST. In ON, you generally remit HST on the whole amount.

3. Operational Benchmarks & Inventory

Profitability requires aggressive management of Prime Costs (COGS + Labour).

The Danger Zone: A Prime Cost above 65% is a red flag for structural insolvency.
Shelf-to-Sheet Counting: Stop using “Sheet-to-Shelf” methods that induce search bias. Count what is physically on the shelf first to capture ghost inventory and obsolescence.
Menu Engineering: Use 2025 data to categorize dishes. Protect “Stars” (high profit/popularity), price-hike “Plowhorses” (low profit/high popularity), and purge “Dogs” (low profit/low popularity).

4. Tax Opportunities & Risks

Carbon Rebate: Ensure your corporate tax filings and T4 summaries are accurate to trigger the Canada Carbon Rebate for Small Businesses (automatic retroactive payments).
GST Holiday Audit: Review your sales journals from Dec 14, 2024, to Feb 15, 2025, to ensure the temporary zero-rating on meals was applied and removed correctly.

Next Step for You: The difference between profitability and insolvency in 2026 will lie in financial precision, not just culinary concept. Would you like Accountific to perform a “Reconciliation Review” of your digital revenue streams or a PIER review of your payroll before you close your 2025 books?

—–

Looking Back: 2025 Financial Landscape

The Canadian foodservice industry stands at a critical juncture as it approaches the close of the 2025 fiscal year. The economic environment has shifted from the post-pandemic recovery phase into a period defined by sustained inflationary pressure, regulatory complexity, and a fundamental restructuring of labour and digital economies. For restaurant owners, franchise operators, and food entrepreneurs, the year-end financial reporting process has evolved from a routine compliance exercise into a high-stakes strategic diagnostic. It is no longer sufficient to merely balance the books; the 2025 year-end report must serve as a roadmap for survival and growth in a year forecasted to see only modest real sales growth of 0.8%.

This guide, prepared for the broader food business community, provides an exhaustive analysis of the financial reporting obligations, tax strategies, and operational benchmarks necessary to close 2025 with precision.

The financial reality for Canadian restaurateurs is stark: operating costs have surged, with insurance premiums rising by 14%, food costs by 13%, and labour costs by 11% over the last two years. In this low-margin environment, financial opacity is an existential threat. The difference between profitability and insolvency often lies not in the culinary concept but in the rigorous management of Prime Costs, the accurate capture of digital revenue streams, and the optimization of tax incentives. You must uncover your restaurant’s financial red flags before they become a death sentence.

As we dissect the components of year-end reporting, from the new multi-tiered Canada Pension Plan (CPP) contributions to the nuances of Marketplace Facilitator tax laws, the overarching theme is one of precision. The era of “shoebox accounting” is definitely over. With the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) implementing new digital platform reporting rules that grant it unprecedented visibility into gig-economy revenue, the reconciliation between a restaurant’s internal point-of-sale (POS) data and the tax filings must be flawless. This article aims to bridge the gap between operational chaos and financial clarity, empowering business owners to reclaim their time and focus on what they do best: serving their customers.

The New Era of Payroll Compliance and Labour Planning

Labour remains the single largest controllable expense in the foodservice industry, yet it is also the area most prone to compliance risk and inflationary creep. The 2025 year-end is not merely about issuing T4s; it is the strategic pivot point for preparing for the significant statutory increases taking effect on January 1, 2026. The maturation of the enhanced Canada Pension Plan (CPP) into a fully realized two-tiered system represents a fundamental shift in the cost of employing mid-to-high-income staff, such as executive chefs and general managers.

The Structural Transformation of CPP Contributions

For decades, the Canada Pension Plan operated on a single tier of earnings. However, the multi-year enhancement plan initiated by the federal government has now introduced a complex dual-layer contribution structure that fully impacts payroll budgets in 2026. Understanding this structure is paramount for accurate year-end accruals and forecasting 2026 cash flow.

The Mechanics of the Two-Tier System

The CPP enhancement introduces two distinct earnings ceilings: the Year’s Maximum Pensionable Earnings (YMPE) and the Year’s Additional Maximum Pensionable Earnings (YAMPE). This structure mandates that employers track cumulative earnings with greater granularity than ever before.

Tier 1: The Base Contribution

The first tier covers earnings up to the standard YMPE. For 2026, the CRA has announced that the YMPE will rise to $74,600, a significant increase of approximately 4.6% from the 2025 limit of $71,300. This adjustment reflects the broad wage inflation occurring across the Canadian economy. Under this tier, both the employee and the employer contribute at a rate of 5.95%.

Implication: The maximum contribution for this tier has escalated. In 2026, the maximum employer contribution per employee for Base CPP will reach $4,230.45, up from $4,034.45 in 2025. This means that for every full-time employee earning above the threshold, the business pays an additional ~$200 purely due to statutory indexing.

Tier 2: The Enhanced Contribution (CPP2)

The second tier, often referred to as “CPP2,” applies to earnings that exceed the YMPE but fall below the new YAMPE. For 2026, the YAMPE has been set at $85,000, increasing from $81,200 in 2025.

The Calculation: Once an employee’s earnings surpass $74,600, the contribution rate drops to 4.00% for both employer and employee, applied only to the marginal earnings up to $85,000.
The Liability: The maximum employer contribution for this second tier is $416.00 in 2026.

Table 1.1: Detailed CPP Contribution Liability Analysis (2025 vs. 2026)

Statutory Component	2025 Limit/Rate	2026 Limit/Rate	Year-Over-Year Variance
Year’s Maximum Pensionable Earnings (YMPE)	$71,300	$74,600	+$3,300 (+4.6%)
Year’s Additional Maximum Pensionable Earnings (YAMPE)	$81,200	$85,000	+$3,800 (+4.7%)
Basic Exemption Amount	$3,500	$3,500	No Change
Tier 1 Rate (Employer)	5.95%	5.95%	No Change
Tier 2 (CPP2) Rate (Employer)	4.00%	4.00%	No Change
Max Base Contribution (Employer)	$4,034.45	$4,230.45	+$196.00
Max Enhanced Contribution (Employer)	$396.00	$416.00	+$20.00
Total Max Annual Cost Per Employee	$4,430.45	$4,646.45	+$216.00 (+4.9%)

Strategic Insight for Budgeting:

The cumulative effect of these increases is non-trivial for restaurant groups with higher-paid management structures. Consider a restaurant group with 15 managers earning $85,000 or more. The statutory CPP increase alone represents an unrecoverable cost increase of over $3,200 for the group in 2026. Financial controllers must adjust their burden rate calculations—the true cost of an employee is not just their salary, but salary plus an increasingly heavy statutory load. When projecting 2026 labour costs during year-end planning, simply rolling forward 2025 figures will result in a budget variance of nearly 5% on statutory benefits.

Employment Insurance (EI) and Provincial Nuances

While CPP grabs headlines due to its structural changes, Employment Insurance (EI) premiums also continue their upward trajectory. The EI system remains a critical safety net, particularly for the seasonal workforce common in the hospitality sector, but it functions as a direct tax on payroll.

For 2026, the Maximum Insurable Earnings (MIE) has increased to $68,900. The federal premium rate for employees is 1.63%, but the employer burden is significantly higher due to the 1.4x multiplier rule. Employers contribute 1.4 times the employee’s premium, leading to an effective rate of 2.28%.

Maximum Employer Cost: The maximum annual EI premium for an employer per employee is $1,572.30.

The Quebec Distinction:

Operators with locations in Quebec face a divergent regime due to the Quebec Parental Insurance Plan (QPIP). In Quebec, the federal EI rate is reduced to offset the QPIP premiums. For 2026, the federal EI rate for Quebec employees is lower at 1.30%, with an employer rate of 1.82%. However, this “savings” is reallocated to QPIP, which has its own contribution schedules.

QPIP Rates: For 2026, the maximum insurable earnings for QPIP are $103,000. The employer contribution rate is 0.602%, with a maximum premium of $620.06.

Year-End Action Item:

Payroll systems must be audited at year-end to ensure the correct tax tables were applied, especially for businesses operating across provincial borders (e.g., a chain with locations in Ottawa and Gatineau). A common error involves applying Ontario rates to Quebec-resident employees or vice versa, leading to significant PIER (Pensionable and Insurable Earnings Review) deficiencies issued by the CRA months after year-end. Errors here are common; make sure you ask yourself: Is your restaurant accidentally overpaying overtime without realizing it?.

The Compliance Minefield: Controlled vs. Direct Tips

Perhaps no area of restaurant payroll is more fraught with audit risk than the taxation of gratuities. The treatment of tips determines whether they are subject to CPP and EI deductions, and getting this wrong can lead to massive retroactive assessments. The CRA and the courts have established a rigorous delineation between “Controlled Tips” and “Direct Tips,” a distinction that every restaurant owner must understand and apply correctly in their 2025 T4 reporting.

The Definition of Controlled Tips

Controlled tips are gratuities that come into the employer’s possession or control before being distributed to the employee. The key legal test is whether the money flows through the employer’s hands in a way that gives the employer decision-making power or custody. Controlled tips are considered pensionable and insurable earnings. This means the employer must withhold Income Tax, CPP, and EI, and must pay the employer’s portion of CPP and EI on these amounts.

Scenarios Classified as Controlled Tips:

Mandatory Service Charges: If a restaurant automatically adds an 18% gratuity to tables of six or more, these funds are contractually owed to the house, which then pays them to the server. This is a controlled tip.
Employer-Managed Tip Pools: If the owner or manager collects all cash and credit tips at the end of the night, calculates a split based on a formula (e.g., 60% to servers, 40% to kitchen), and distributes the cash, this is a controlled arrangement. The employer’s involvement in the distribution formula constitutes control.
Percentage of Sales Arrangements: If a server is required to “tip out” 5% of their gross sales to the house for redistribution to support staff, the portion taken by the house becomes controlled tips for the recipients (e.g., the busser or cook).

Reporting Mechanics: Controlled tips must be included in Box 14 (Employment Income) on the T4 slip. Crucially, they must also be added to Box 24 (EI Insurable Earnings) and Box 26 (CPP Pensionable Earnings).

The Definition of Direct Tips

Direct tips are those paid freely by the customer to the employee, where the employer acts merely as a conduit or has no involvement at all. These are not subject to CPP or EI source deductions and are not reported on the T4 slip by the employer (outside of Quebec).

Scenarios Classified as Direct Tips:

Cash Left on the Table: The classic scenario where a customer leaves a $20 bill, and the server pockets it. The employer never touches the money.
Electronic Pass-Through: A customer adds a $10 tip on a credit card machine. The employer settles the batch, receives the $10 from the processor, and pays the employee the exact $10 in cash at the end of the shift. The CRA views the employer here as a mere trustee of the funds, provided no deductions or pooling formulas are applied by the employer.
Employee-Led Pooling: If the staff voluntarily agree—without management mandate—to pool their tips and split them, these remain direct tips. The absence of employer compulsion is the deciding factor.

The Quebec “Declared Tips” Regime:

Quebec operates under a unique legislative framework. Employees in regulated establishments (hotels, bars, restaurants) are legally required to declare their direct tips to their employer at the end of each pay period. The employer must then add these declared tips to the employee’s insurable earnings for the purpose of QPP, QPIP, and EI calculations. In Quebec, declared tips appear in Box 14 and Box 24 of the T4/RL-1, creating a higher payroll tax burden for Quebec employers compared to their Ontario counterparts.

Table 1.2: Tax Treatment of Gratuities by Type

Tip Category	Employer Control?	Subject to CPP/EI?	T4 Reporting Requirement
Direct Tips (Cash/Electronic)	No	No	None (Employee reports on T1 Line 10400)
Controlled Tips (Pools/Service Charges)	Yes	Yes	Box 14, Box 24, Box 26
Declared Tips (Quebec Only)	No (but mandatory declaration)	Yes	Box 14, Box 24, Box 26

Audit Warning: The CRA explicitly targets restaurants that treat all electronic tips as direct tips without analyzing their pooling policies. If an audit reveals that managers were determining the tip-out percentages, the CRA will reclassify years of direct tips as controlled tips. The employer will then be assessed for both the employer and employee portions of CPP and EI that were not remitted, plus penalties and interest. This can amount to tens of thousands of dollars for a small establishment.

Year-End Payroll Reconciliation Checklist

To close the 2025 payroll year with confidence, Accountific recommends the following reconciliation procedures:

Box 14 Reconciliation: Compare the total gross payroll in your accounting software (GL Account: Salaries and Wages) with the sum of Box 14 on all T4s. Any variance must be identified. Common culprits include taxable benefits (e.g., cell phone allowances, parking) that were paid through Accounts Payable but not recorded in payroll.
PIER Review: Perform a “Pensionable and Insurable Earnings Review” (PIER) before filing. Calculate 5.95% of each employee’s pensionable earnings (up to $71,300 for 2025) minus the basic exemption. Does it match the deducted CPP? If not, adjust the final remittance to correct the under-deduction.
T4A Preparation: Do not overlook independent contractors. If you paid a sous-chef or cleaner as a contractor (more than $500), you must issue a T4A slip. Failing to do so can lead to penalties and the potential reclassification of that contractor as an employee during an audit.
Update Tax Tables for Jan 1: Ensure your payroll software provider (or internal system) is updated with the 2026 TD1 claim amounts ($16,452 federal basic personal amount) and the new CPP/EI rates before the first pay run of January 2026.

Revenue Recognition in the Digital Economy

The restaurant revenue model has fractured. The unified stream of “Sales” has dissolved into a complex tributary system of dine-in, takeout, and multiple third-party delivery platforms (Uber Eats, DoorDash, Skip). For the 2025 financial report, the accurate recognition of these revenue streams is the single most critical accounting challenge. The “net deposit” method—a relic of simpler times—is now a compliance liability that creates tax risks and distorts operational reality.

The “Gross vs. Net” Accounting Imperative

A pervasive error in restaurant bookkeeping involves recording the net bank deposit from a delivery platform directly as sales revenue. This approach violates the fundamental accounting principle of neutrality and leads to a systemic understatement of both revenue and expenses.

The Anatomy of a Transaction:

Consider a customer order placed on UberEats for $50.00.

Gross Sale: $50.00 (The price of the food).
Commission (30%): -$15.00 (The expense paid to Uber).
Marketing/Service Fee: -$5.00 (Additional promo fees).
Net Deposit: $30.00 (The amount hitting the bank).

The Accounting Error (Net Method):

If the bookkeeper simply records Debit Bank $30, Credit Sales $30, the financial statements are materially wrong.

Revenue Understatement: Sales are reported as $30, not $50. This skews the Prime Cost ratio (Food Cost / Sales). If the food cost was $15, the “Net” method yields a 50% food cost ($15/$30), whereas the “Gross” method yields a correct 30% food cost ($15/$50).
Expense Omission: The $20 in commissions and fees disappears from the P&L. The owner loses visibility into the true cost of customer acquisition.
Tax Variance: GST/HST is owed on the Gross sale of $50, not the net $30. Reporting based on net deposits leads to under-remittance of sales tax, a primary trigger for CRA audits.

The Correct “Gross Up” Methodology:

Accountific mandates the “Gross Up” method for all clients. Every payout from a delivery platform must be reconciled using the platform’s detailed payment report (CSV), not just the bank feed.

Standard Journal Entry:

Debit: Cash/Bank (Net Payout Received) – $30.00
Debit: Delivery Commission Expense – $15.00
Debit: Marketing/Promo Expense – $5.00
Credit: Food Sales (Gross) – $50.00
Credit: GST/HST Payable (collected on the gross sale) – $X.XX.

By recording the gross amount, the restaurant accurately reflects its volume and expenses, allowing for valid year-over-year comparisons and accurate ratio analysis.

Marketplace Facilitator Laws: The Provincial Divide

The complexity of revenue recognition is compounded by the “Marketplace Facilitator” tax laws, which create a two-speed tax system in Canada. Restaurant owners operating in multiple provinces must be acutely aware that the rules for UberEats in Ontario are radically different from the rules in British Columbia.

The General Rule (Ontario, Alberta, Atlantic Canada):

In these jurisdictions, the restaurant remains the “Seller of Record” for tax purposes. Even though UberEats collects the payment, the restaurant is responsible for remitting the GST/HST on the food sale.

Process: UberEats collects the full order value + tax from the customer. They deduct their fees. They send the restaurant the Net Food Value + the Full Tax Amount.
Restaurant Duty: The restaurant must remit that tax to the CRA.

The Marketplace Facilitator Exception (BC, SK, MB):

British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba have enacted legislation that shifts the burden of collecting and remitting Provincial Sales Tax (PST or RST) to the platform itself.

The Split: In these provinces, UberEats collects the PST/RST and remits it directly to the province. They do not send this tax money to the restaurant.
The GST Trap: However, the Marketplace Facilitator laws generally apply only to provincial tax. The restaurant remains responsible for remitting the federal GST (5%).
Process: UberEats collects PST + GST. They keep the PST to pay the province. They send the GST to the restaurant.
Restaurant Duty: The restaurant must still remit the 5% GST to the CRA.

Table 2.1: Delivery Platform Tax Responsibilities by Region

Region	Tax Collected by Platform	Tax Remitted by Platform	Tax Remitted by Restaurant
Ontario (HST)	13% HST	None	13% HST
Alberta (GST)	5% GST	None	5% GST
British Columbia (GST/PST)	5% GST + 7% PST	7% PST	5% GST
Saskatchewan (GST/PST)	5% GST + 6% PST	6% PST	5% GST
Manitoba (GST/RST)	5% GST + 7% RST	7% RST	5% GST

Strategic Risk: A restaurant in Vancouver that mistakenly assumes UberEats is handling “all the taxes” (like they do with PST) will fail to remit the 5% GST. Over a year with $500,000 in delivery sales, this creates a $25,000 tax liability deficiency, plus interest and penalties.

The 2025 CRA Data-Sharing Regime

The 2025 fiscal year marks the commencement of a new era of transparency. Under new federal legislation effective for the 2024 tax year (reporting in early 2025), digital platform operators like UberEats, DoorDash, and SkipTheDishes are legally required to report seller income directly to the CRA.

What This Means:

The CRA will receive an annual information return from these platforms listing:

The restaurant’s Business Number.
The Gross Sales processed through the platform.
The total fees are deducted.

The Audit Trigger:

The CRA’s automated systems will cross-reference the gross income reported by UberEats against the revenue reported on the restaurant’s T2 Corporate Return (GIFI Line 8000). If the restaurant has been using the “Net Deposit” method described in Section 2.1, its reported revenue will be significantly lower than the figure provided by UberEats.

Result: This discrepancy is a primary flag for an audit. The CRA will demand an explanation for the “missing” revenue.

Action Item: Accountific advises a proactive “Reconciliation Review” for the 2025 year-end. Before filing the T2 return, verify that the total delivery revenue recorded in the books matches the sum of the monthly Gross Sales reports provided by the delivery platforms. Any variance must be investigated immediately.

Calculating the True ROI of Delivery

Financial reporting is not just about tax compliance; it is about business intelligence. The 2025 year-end report is the opportunity to assess the viability of third-party delivery. While the “headline” commission rates are often 15-30%, the Total Real Cost of delivery is often much higher.

The Hidden Costs:

Payment Processing: Platforms often charge a processing fee (e.g., 2.9%) on top of commissions, which is higher than the restaurant’s own terminal rate.
Marketing/Promos: “Featured” placement fees or “free delivery” subsidies paid by the restaurant (1-5%).
Error Adjustments: Refunds for missing items or cold food are often deducted automatically, regardless of fault (0.5-2%).

The ROI Formula:

To determine if delivery is profitable, operators must calculate the True Commission Rate:

True Commission Rate = ((Total Commissions + Processing Fees + Marketing Fees + Adjustments) / Total Gross Third-Party Sales) x 100

Industry analysis suggests this rate often lands between 35% and 48%. If a restaurant’s food cost is 30% and labour is 30%, a 40% delivery cost leaves zero margin. This calculation dictates 2026 pricing strategies: restaurants may need to inflate delivery menu prices by 20-25% over dine-in prices to preserve any margin, a practice known as “Menu Price Inflation,” which carries its own risks of customer alienation.

Inventory Management and Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)

Inventory is cash on a shelf. In a restaurant, it is also a degrading asset that rots, spills, and disappears. For the 2025 year-end, the transition from theoretical inventory management to rigorous physical verification is essential for establishing an accurate Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). The COGS figure is the most significant deduction on the income statement; its accuracy directly correlates to the integrity of the entire financial report.

The “Shelf-to-Sheet” Methodology

The accuracy of the year-end inventory value depends entirely on the physical counting process. Accountific strongly advocates for the Shelf-to-Sheet method over the traditional Sheet-to-Shelf approach.

The Flaw of Sheet-to-Shelf:

In the Sheet-to-Shelf method, the counter holds a printed list of items (from the POS or order guide) and walks around looking for them.

Risk: This induces “search bias.” If “Truffle Oil” is on the sheet, the counter looks for it. If “Saffron” was purchased specially but isn’t on the standard sheet, the counter will likely walk right past it without recording it. This leads to “ghost inventory”—assets that exist physically but are missing from the financial books.

The Superiority of Shelf-to-Sheet:

In the Shelf-to-Sheet method, the counter ignores the list initially. They start at the top left corner of the first rack in the walk-in cooler and record every single item sitting on the shelf, moving systematically to the bottom right.

Advantage: This captures everything, including obsolete items, unlisted specials, and overstock. It forces a complete audit of the physical reality.
Implementation: Best practice involves organizing the inventory software to mirror the physical layout of the storage areas (e.g., Walk-in 1, Freezer 2, Dry Storage A) so that the digital entry matches the physical flow.

The Mathematics of COGS

The determination of COGS is derived from the periodic inventory system formula:

COGS = Beginning Inventory + Purchases – Ending Inventory

The Impact of Ending Inventory:

This formula highlights why the year-end count is critical. There is an inverse relationship between Ending Inventory and COGS.

Scenario: If a restaurant overstates its Ending Inventory by $10,000 (counting expired food that should be trash), the COGS decreases by $10,000.
Result: Net Income increases by $10,000.
Consequence: The restaurant pays taxes on $10,000 of “profit” that doesn’t exist. Accurate counting is a tax-minimization strategy.

Spoilage, Waste, and Internal Use

A sophisticated financial report distinguishes between productive food cost (sold to customers) and unproductive food cost (waste, theft, comps). For a detailed look at turning this data into a strategy, read How Strategic Waste Management Boosts Your Restaurant’s Resilience and Revenue.

Spoilage Treatment:

From a tax perspective (CRA and IRS), spoilage is generally absorbed into COGS. When a case of tomatoes rots and is discarded, it is not counted in Ending Inventory. This naturally raises COGS, effectively deducting the cost of the tomatoes from taxable income.

Operational Gap: While the tax deduction happens automatically via the math, the operational insight is lost unless a separate “Waste Log” is maintained. The financial report should ideally include a memo line for “Known Waste” to differentiate it from theft.

Staff Meals and Marketing (Comps):

Food consumed by staff or given away for marketing purposes (e.g., feeding an influencer) is not COGS in the strict sense—it is a labour benefit or a marketing expense.

Journal Entry: A year-end adjustment should be made to reclassify these costs.
- Debit: Employee Benefits (Staff Meals)
- Debit: Marketing Expense (Promo Meals)
- Credit: COGS (Food Cost)
Tax Nuance: This is vital because “Meals and Entertainment” expenses are often only 50% deductible for tax purposes, whereas COGS is 100% deductible. Misclassifying a promotional meal as standard COGS could be viewed as tax avoidance during an audit. However, staff meals are generally fully deductible as a labour expense.

Prime Cost Benchmarks for 2025

The ultimate health metric for any food business is Prime Cost, the sum of COGS and Total Labour.

Prime Cost = Total COGS + Total Labour Cost

For the 2025 year-end report, compare the business’s performance against these updated Canadian benchmarks:

Quick Service Restaurants (QSR): Target 55-60%. The efficiency of limited menus and lower service labour allows for this tighter margin.
Full-Service / Casual Dining: Target 60-65%. Higher service standards necessitate higher labour, pushing the prime cost up.
The Danger Zone: Any Prime Cost exceeding 65% is a red flag. It indicates that for every dollar of sales, less than 35 cents is left to pay rent, utilities, insurance, and profit. In the current inflationary environment, a restaurant operating above 65% Prime Cost is structurally insolvent.

Strategic Profitability & Menu Engineering

Year-end financial reporting generates the granular data necessary to perform Menu Engineering. This is the process of analyzing the profitability and popularity of individual menu items to make data-driven decisions for the 2026 menu. In a year where food inflation has hit 13%, static menu pricing is a recipe for margin erosion. We explore this concept further in our guide on Canadian Restaurant Strategies for Thriving in Inflation.

The Menu Engineering Matrix

By plotting every menu item on a scatter graph—with Profitability (Contribution Margin) on the Y-axis and Popularity (Sales Volume) on the X-axis—we identify four distinct categories of items. Each requires a specific strategic action in 2026.

Stars (High Profit, High Popularity)

Definition: The signature dishes. They define the brand and drive the bank account.
2026 Strategy: Protect and Prioritize. Do not alter the recipe to save pennies. Ensure these items are prominent on the physical and digital menu (top right corner, highlighted). Price elasticity is often lower here; small price increases may be tolerated, but quality consistency is non-negotiable.

Plowhorses (Low Profit, High Popularity)

Definition: The crowd-pleasers (e.g., the basic burger, wings). They bring people in, but drag down the overall food cost percentage due to low margins.
2026 Strategy: Maximize Contribution. You cannot remove them without losing customers. Instead, focus on incremental margin gains. Can you reduce the portion size slightly (e.g., 6oz fries instead of 8oz)? Can you switch to a cheaper garnish? A 5% price increase on a high-volume Plowhorse can significantly impact the bottom line.

Puzzles (High Profit, Low Popularity)

Definition: High-margin items that nobody orders. They are “puzzles” because they should be winners.
2026 Strategy: Solve or Delete. The issue is usually visibility or description. Rename the dish to sound more appetizing. Move it to a “hot spot” on the menu. Train servers to recommend it as a favorite. If these marketing efforts fail after one quarter, remove the item to streamline inventory and prep.

Dogs (Low Profit, Low Popularity)

Definition: The losers. They consume inventory capital, prep labour, and menu space, but offer neither volume nor profit.
2026 Strategy: Purge. There is rarely a justification for keeping a Dog. They distract the kitchen during the rush and dilute the brand identity. Removing Dogs is often the fastest way to lower labour costs and food waste.

Inflationary Pricing and Psychological Thresholds

The 2025 year-end review must compare the current landed cost of ingredients against the menu prices set in 2024.

The Lag Effect: Restaurants often suffer from “pricing lag,” where ingredient costs rise monthly, but menu prices are adjusted annually. This lag can cost percentage points of margin.
Action: Calculate the theoretical food cost of every item using December 2025 invoice prices. If a dish was costed at 30% in Jan 2025 but is now running at 38% due to beef inflation, the price must be adjusted immediately.

Tax Planning, Rebates & Incentives for 2025

The 2025 fiscal landscape is not all headwinds; specific government incentives and rebates provide opportunities for cash flow recovery. Accountific emphasizes that ensuring eligibility for these programs is a core component of the year-end engagement. For a complete strategy, see how to Drive Higher Profits and Fuel Your Restaurant’s Growth with Proactive Tax Strategy.

The Canada Carbon Rebate for Small Businesses

A major liquidity event for eligible corporations in 2025 is the Canada Carbon Rebate for Small Businesses. This is a refundable tax credit designed to return a portion of the federal fuel charge proceeds to small businesses.

Eligibility Criteria:

CCPC Status: The business must be a Canadian-Controlled Private Corporation throughout the tax year. Sole proprietorships do not qualify.
Employee Count: The business must have 499 or fewer employees throughout Canada.
Filing Deadline: For the retroactive payment covering the 2019-2020 through 2023-2024 periods, the corporate tax return for the 2023 tax year must generally have been filed by July 15, 2024. However, the government has signaled that late filers (filed by Dec 31, 2024) may still be eligible, subject to legislative approval.

Payment Mechanics:

The rebate is automatic; no application is required. The CRA calculates the amount based on the number of T4 slips issued and the province of operation.

Example: An Ontario restaurant with 10 employees could receive approximately $980 for the 2024-2025 period alone.
Timing: Retroactive payments began in late 2024/early 2025. The payment for the 2024-2025 fuel charge year is scheduled for distribution starting in December 2025.

Accountific Action: Verify that all corporate tax filings (T2) are up to date. Ensure the employee count (T4 summary) accurately reflects the workforce to maximize this rebate.

The Temporary GST/HST Holiday (2024/2025)

A unique complexity for the 2025 year-end is the temporary GST/HST holiday that ran from December 14, 2024, to February 15, 2025. During this window, qualifying items—including prepared meals, beer, wine, and non-alcoholic beverages—were zero-rated (0% tax).

Accounting Implications:

Zero-Rated vs. Exempt: These sales were zero-rated, meaning the restaurant charged 0% tax but could still claim Input Tax Credits (ITCs) on expenses.
POS Configuration Risk: If a restaurant failed to update its POS to stop charging tax on Dec 14, or failed to re-enable tax on Feb 16, 2025, the tax liability account will be incorrect.
- Scenario A (Over-collection): If tax was collected during the holiday, it must be remitted to the CRA or refunded to the customer. It cannot be kept as profit.
- Scenario B (Under-collection): If the tax was not turned back on after Feb 15, the restaurant is liable for the uncollected tax out of its own pocket.
Year-End Audit: Review sales journals for mid-February to ensure the tax switch-over occurred correctly. Additionally, double-check that you are separating personal and business expenses, as this is often where audits begin.

Alcohol Excise Duties and Single-Use Plastics

Alcohol Excise Duty:

Federal excise duties on alcohol are adjusted annually on April 1st based on CPI. For 2025, the government has capped this adjustment at 2%.40 While paid by manufacturers, this tax is embedded in the wholesale price paid by restaurants. Inventory valuations for alcohol should reflect these increased costs.

Single-Use Plastics Ban:

The regulatory prohibition on single-use plastics (cutlery, checkout bags, straws) is now in the “Sale” prohibition phase. By December 2025, the ban will extend to the export of these items. Restaurants must ensure their inventory does not contain prohibited plastics, as they are legally unsalable. The cost of compliant alternatives (fiber, wood) is generally higher, necessitating an adjustment to the “Paper & Supplies” budget line for 2026.

The Accountific Year-End Closing Methodology

To transform these insights into a completed financial report, Accountific recommends a structured, three-phase closing process. This methodology ensures nothing slips through the cracks. For a deeper understanding of our approach, see how you can Maximize Restaurant Profits: Gain Control, Cut Costs, and Thrive.

Phase 1: Pre-Close Preparation (Weeks 1-2 of December)

Asset Review: Scan the fixed asset ledger. Identify equipment that was scrapped or broken during the year (e.g., a burnt-out fryer). Record a “Terminal Loss” to write off the remaining book value and reduce taxable income.
Vendor Audit: Review the Accounts Payable sub-ledger. Contact vendors for missing invoices to ensure all 2025 expenses are accrued. Request W-9s or tax IDs from all unincorporated contractors in preparation for T4A issuance.
Inventory Setup: Print Shelf-to-Sheet count templates. Ensure all new menu items and ingredients are entered into the inventory system with current costs.

Phase 2: The Cut-Off (December 31st)

The Count: Conduct the physical inventory count. This must happen after the last sale of the year and before the first delivery of the new year.
Cash Reconciliation: Count all petty cash, floats, and safe contents. Reconcile against the General Ledger balance.
Sales Cut-Off: Ensure the final batch settlements from credit card processors and delivery platforms are recorded in December, even if the cash lands in the bank in January.

Phase 3: Analysis and Reporting (January – February)

Delivery Reconciliation: Perform the “Gross vs. Net” test on all delivery revenue. Adjust journals as necessary.
Payroll Finalization: Run the PIER test. Validate Tip (Controlled vs. Direct) classifications. File T4s/RL-1s by the end of February.
Menu Engineering: Run the Stars/Dogs analysis using the finalized food cost data.
Ratio Analysis: Calculate final Prime Cost. If >65%, schedule an immediate operational review.
Final Review: Ask yourself: Could your restaurant survive a CRA audit?.

Conclusion

The 2025 year-end reporting cycle is a test of a restaurant’s operational maturity. The convergence of structural payroll changes (CPP2), the digital transparency of the gig economy, and the tight margins imposed by inflation leaves no room for approximation.

By adopting the Shelf-to-Sheet inventory method, adhering to the Gross Revenue recognition principle for delivery, and rigorously managing the Controlled vs. Direct tip distinction, restaurant owners can insulate themselves from audit risk and gain the clarity needed to navigate 2026. This discipline enables you to Steer Your Canadian Restaurant to Absolute Profit with Weekly Financial GPS.

At Accountific, we understand that you did not follow your passion for food to spend your evenings wrestling with spreadsheets. The goal of this guide, and our service, is to lift the burden of compliance, allowing you to return to the dining room where your business truly lives. The numbers tell the story of the past year; your interpretation of them writes the story of the next. Let us ensure that the story is one of precision, profitability, and growth. Book a call with Accountific today.

——————–

David Monteith, founder of Accountific, is a seasoned digital entrepreneur and a Xero Silver Partner Advisor. Leveraging over three decades of business management and financial expertise, David specialises in providing tailored Xero solutions for food and beverage businesses. His deep understanding of this industry, combined with his proficiency in Xero, allows him to streamline accounting processes, deliver valuable financial insights, and drive greater success for his clients.